|
Post by arges on Nov 16, 2017 1:57:33 GMT -6
What the heck are all these schools wanting to opt up to Division 1? It only defeats the real purpose of dividing the classes.
|
|
|
Post by bowiedawgs01 on Nov 16, 2017 2:57:38 GMT -6
McCallum and maybe Lanier should be allowed to opt up. The rest are small 5A's and couldn't beat anybody anyway. Heck Seguin slaughtered Travis and only finished 2-8. The only way Crockett made the playoffs is that they were a tiny bit better than the rest. Crockett, Travis, Lanier, and Reagan couldn't beat anyone in D2 or D1 right now. All being in the same district will pretty much guarantee 2, maybe 3, teams get in the playoffs. They'd all lose in the first round no matter which division they were in, so why not all be in the same district? Nothing to lose. What's funny is that the only D1 school, LBJ, is technically fielding a football team with 4A numbers. Their campus houses LASA, the ISD's magnet school. LASA is over 1,100 kids while LBJ is only about 800. Very few LASA kids play football.
|
|
|
Post by rtxc1 on Nov 16, 2017 11:49:24 GMT -6
What the heck are all these schools wanting to opt up to Division 1? It only defeats the real purpose of dividing the classes. It really is getting to the point where we need multi-HS ISDs in their own division,
|
|
|
Post by leopard4life on Nov 16, 2017 14:51:08 GMT -6
What the heck are all these schools wanting to opt up to Division 1? It only defeats the real purpose of dividing the classes. It really is getting to the point where we need multi-HS ISDs in their own division, Or don't allow up opts. They really have too much control of the DEC and the Bi-District voting. If a school is thrown into a district with a lot of schools from the same ISD they really lose any voting power or alliances they might have had otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by FB fan on Nov 16, 2017 15:15:37 GMT -6
It really is getting to the point where we need multi-HS ISDs in their own division, Or don't allow up opts. They really have too much control of the DEC and the Bi-District voting. If a school is thrown into a district with a lot of schools from the same ISD they really lose any voting power or alliances they might have had otherwise. EXACTLY. Corpus Christi ISD has six schools using the opt up to keep them in the same district. They will control every vote. We know this from previous behavior.
|
|
|
Post by flowtowntigers on Nov 21, 2017 13:07:06 GMT -6
We just need family's to move back to Beeville, Fredericksburg and Plesanton to fill up the SA area districts.
|
|
|
Post by rangers on Nov 22, 2017 15:05:37 GMT -6
What the heck are all these schools wanting to opt up to Division 1? It only defeats the real purpose of dividing the classes. What was the logic in the sups voting this in, in the first place?
|
|
|
Post by arges on Nov 22, 2017 15:40:10 GMT -6
Region 4 was the only region that voted against the split. Maybe that's why CCISD, Austin ISD, and the San Antonio districts are supposedly opting up along with Frisco ISD.
|
|
|
Post by rtxc1 on Nov 22, 2017 16:06:06 GMT -6
What the heck are all these schools wanting to opt up to Division 1? It only defeats the real purpose of dividing the classes. What was the logic in the sups voting this in, in the first place? 1. So big schools donβt land in the D2 bracket. 2. So playoffs will finally have a true 1-4 seeding system. Yes, my school is affected by both of those, as Boswell would have been D1 playing in the D2 bracket, and also both schools finished in 2nd place in their respective districts, yet met in round one.
|
|
|
Post by FB fan on Nov 22, 2017 18:25:55 GMT -6
What the heck are all these schools wanting to opt up to Division 1? It only defeats the real purpose of dividing the classes. What was the logic in the sups voting this in, in the first place? Bottom line was for fair competition between more similarly sized schools. Currently division 1 or 2 in 5A is meaningless. A D2 school from one district can currently be much larger than a D1 in another.
|
|
|
Post by cujo2002 on Dec 6, 2017 12:25:49 GMT -6
8-5A (I) (7 schools) McKinney North, Mesquite (Poteet, West), Sherman Texarkana Texas, Tyler, Wylie East
Now you can add Highland Park to the district.
|
|
|
Post by leopard4life on Dec 6, 2017 13:03:04 GMT -6
8-5A (I) (7 schools) McKinney North, Mesquite (Poteet, West), Sherman Texarkana Texas, Tyler, Wylie East Now you can add Highland Park to the district. Geographically Tyler is a big outlier in this proposed district.
|
|
|
Post by cujo2002 on Dec 6, 2017 13:18:51 GMT -6
8-5A (I) (7 schools) McKinney North, Mesquite (Poteet, West), Sherman Texarkana Texas, Tyler, Wylie East Now you can add Highland Park to the district. Geographically Tyler is a big outlier in this proposed district. Texas High is farther than Tyler. It is only an hour and ten minute drive from downtown Dallas.
|
|
|
Post by leopard4life on Dec 6, 2017 15:02:31 GMT -6
Geographically Tyler is a big outlier in this proposed district. Texas High is farther than Tyler. It is only an hour and ten minute drive from downtown Dallas. I didn't even notice Texas High on the list.
|
|
|
Post by rtxc1 on Dec 6, 2017 15:20:46 GMT -6
Texas High is farther than Tyler. It is only an hour and ten minute drive from downtown Dallas. I didn't even notice Texas High on the list. It worked out well on the map. Someone had to go there. It's all meaningless now.
|
|