|
Post by warcat82 on Nov 1, 2023 14:03:39 GMT -6
Daggum just cause a kid says another kid is mean across from another kid doesn't mean jack! Heck I know some mean girls that can line up and make boys cry on the other side... doesn't make them good.... Heck TM a couple years ago had some mean fellas that were nut punchers and ankle biters... cheated every chance they got and down right dirty when they got you in a pile... went 1-9, but they were mean! Bullies even! Mean does not equal good all the time... Now when you look at a College Station or a Smithson Valley or an Aledo or a DeSoto, those kids are physical. They play whistle to whistle. They are strong as an ox. Country boy strong even! They don't just have beach muscles. They are nasty when it comes to pursuing the ball, like a starving pack of lions ready to maul their pray. They're not dirty about it, but you dang sure will feel it when they hit you. When 2 or 3 hit you, oh lawd you're gonna want to not want the ball anymore. So just cause a kid says someone was mean to play, doesn't mean they were good. North is a good Valley team and this year is probably the best Region 4 has to offer in the cesspool created by the brainchild that is ccisd. Had district 11 and 12 gotten to stay and be involved, Region 4 would be reputable this go round and given CS a run for its money with Smithson Valley or Cedar Park or Wagner. Sounds like 9-5-90!!Black Rain!!!
|
|
|
Post by warcat82 on Nov 1, 2023 14:12:24 GMT -6
I'm not sure CC Warcat will understand this? ? But nice attempt though.... Nope Hell, I've watched 3 of North's games. I will admit they are big up front offensively. And, they may be strong and mean. But they are not what I'd call an overly athletic, quick line. They have a good running game for sure but the passing game is very average. It may be good for a RGV team but it is NOT better than average when comparing it to the good passing teams in 5a D1 statewide. I also do not see any overwhelming team speed for them and this is what I think that, and the weak sauce schedule they've played and are going to play in the R4 playoffs are going to be their downfall against a R3 top team. I honestly think SV's defense would eat that North offense up! I do think North's defense is good but again, does anyone here believe they'd own 7 shutout wins if they'd played SV's schedule. I don't think so. lmao SV has already played at least 5 teams that are far better than any North has played and beat them all. That said, I wouldn't pick SV right now to win R3. I think CS is the favorite. Because SV is Region 4 let's be honest.... but we all know why they aren't right now...
|
|
|
Post by ccwarcat on Nov 1, 2023 15:47:41 GMT -6
Ok, watch. PSJA North will dominate any team in R4... and they'll beat the best R3 throws out there in Round 5. PSJA North will also give Aledo a good run (if Aledo is there). If Aledo is not there, give me the Raiders in that SC game.
|
|
|
Post by warcat82 on Nov 1, 2023 16:35:03 GMT -6
You are on some strong hallucinogenics!!! If they get within 40 points of CS I'll be shocked. If anyone from region 4 gets within 40 of CS I'll be shocked...
|
|
|
Post by TWolvesFan on Nov 1, 2023 17:25:31 GMT -6
You are on some strong hallucinogenics!!! If they get within 40 points of CS I'll be shocked. If anyone from region 4 gets within 40 of CS I'll be shocked... I’ll give College Station a half to get everything worked out. that is before they drop the hammer in the 2nd half… Sound familiar?
1st Half CS 21 PSJA 13
FINAL CS 52 PSJA 23
|
|
|
Post by picodegallo on Nov 1, 2023 17:37:32 GMT -6
Ok, watch. PSJA North will dominate any team in R4... and they'll beat the best R3 throws out there in Round 5. PSJA North will also give Aledo a good run (if Aledo is there). If Aledo is not there, give me the Raiders in that SC game.
|
|
|
Post by Clemensbuff on Nov 2, 2023 5:26:40 GMT -6
You are on some strong hallucinogenics!!! If they get within 40 points of CS I'll be shocked. If anyone from region 4 gets within 40 of CS I'll be shocked... I’ll give College Station a half to get everything worked out. that is before they drop the hammer in the 2nd half… Sound familiar?
1st Half CS 21 PSJA 13
FINAL CS 52 PSJA 23I think your first half score is almost dead on the $. I think it would end up a little lower spread though just simply because of North's big front line and maybe running clock with some 1st downs. I think CS would win it about 42-21 or maybe a TD more. Your final score may very well be right on the money though if North struggles with CS' speed.
|
|
|
Post by Clemensbuff on Nov 2, 2023 5:58:02 GMT -6
I started thinking about ccwarcat's statement and how he believes Aledo is the only team that can beat PSJA North. So, I'm going to spend a few minutes on calpreps and see what their computer thinks. Yes, I know this is a computer but the fact is that it is about 75% or a little better accuracy at this stage of the season and even much higher than that when it shows point spreads of more than 10 points in a projected matchup. There are 6 teams in red below where it shows North with 15% or LESS chance of winning the game. Of those 6 teams NONE are showing less than a 2 TD win by them. There are 8 more in orange where North is at least a 10 point underdog with 25% or less chance of winning the game. Region 1 Teams[2023] Abilene (TX) 34 (84%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 19 (16%) [2023] Lubbock-Cooper (Lubbock, TX) 35 (81%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (19%)[2023] Amarillo (TX) 24 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 23 (47%) [2023] Aledo (TX) 41 (94%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 17 (6%)[2023] Ryan [Billy] (Denton, TX) 22 (57%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 20 (43%)[2023] Northwest (Justin, TX) 31 (74%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (26%)[2023] Midlothian (TX) 31 (74%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (26%)[2023] Red Oak (TX) 28 (65%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (35%) [2023] Lake Belton (Temple, TX) 34 (58%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 31 (42%) Region 2 Teams[2023] Richland (North Richland Hills, TX) 28 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 27 (47%) [2023] Lone Star (Frisco, TX) 31 (74%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (26%)[2023] Reedy [Rick] (Frisco, TX) 35 (86%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 19 (14%)[2023] Wakeland [Justin] (Frisco, TX) 28 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 27 (47%) [2023] Longview (TX) 40 (98%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 8 (2%)[2023] Forney (TX) 38 (95%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 13 (5%)[2023] McKinney North (McKinney, TX) 34 (77%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (23%) [2023] Barbers Hill (Mt. Belvieu, TX) 35 (75%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 24 (25%)[2023] Memorial (Port Arthur, TX) 31 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 30 (47%) Region 3 Teams[2023] Fulshear (TX) 41 (88%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (12%)[2023] Magnolia (TX) 28 (62%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (38%) [2023] College Station (TX) 48 (88%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 28 (12%)[2023] A&M Consolidated (College Station, TX) 27 (62%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (38%) [2023] Cedar Park (TX) 24 (57%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (43%) [2023] Smithson Valley (Spring Branch, TX) 31 (77%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 19 (23%)[2023] Wagner (San Antonio, TX) 26 (60%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (40%) Wake up ccwarcat and start learning more about HSFB outside of this region!
|
|
|
Post by TWolvesFan on Nov 2, 2023 7:58:31 GMT -6
I started thinking about ccwarcat's statement and how he believes Aledo is the only team that can beat PSJA North. So, I'm going to spend a few minutes on calpreps and see what their computer thinks. Yes, I know this is a computer but the fact is that it is about 75% or a little better accuracy at this stage of the season and even much higher than that when it shows point spreads of more than 10 points in a projected matchup. There are 6 teams in red below where it shows North with 15% or LESS chance of winning the game. Of those 6 teams NONE are showing less than a 2 TD win by them. There are 8 more in orange where North is at least a 10 point underdog with 25% or less chance of winning the game. Region 1 Teams[2023] Abilene (TX) 34 (84%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 19 (16%) [2023] Lubbock-Cooper (Lubbock, TX) 35 (81%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (19%)[2023] Amarillo (TX) 24 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 23 (47%) [2023] Aledo (TX) 41 (94%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 17 (6%)[2023] Ryan [Billy] (Denton, TX) 22 (57%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 20 (43%)[2023] Northwest (Justin, TX) 31 (74%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (26%)[2023] Midlothian (TX) 31 (74%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (26%)[2023] Red Oak (TX) 28 (65%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (35%) [2023] Lake Belton (Temple, TX) 34 (58%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 31 (42%) Region 2 Teams[2023] Richland (North Richland Hills, TX) 28 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 27 (47%) [2023] Lone Star (Frisco, TX) 31 (74%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (26%)[2023] Reedy [Rick] (Frisco, TX) 35 (86%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 19 (14%)[2023] Wakeland [Justin] (Frisco, TX) 28 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 27 (47%) [2023] Longview (TX) 40 (98%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 8 (2%)[2023] Forney (TX) 38 (95%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 13 (5%)[2023] McKinney North (McKinney, TX) 34 (77%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (23%) [2023] Barbers Hill (Mt. Belvieu, TX) 35 (75%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 24 (25%)[2023] Memorial (Port Arthur, TX) 31 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 30 (47%) Region 3 Teams[2023] Fulshear (TX) 41 (88%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (12%)[2023] Magnolia (TX) 28 (62%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (38%) [2023] College Station (TX) 48 (88%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 28 (12%)[2023] A&M Consolidated (College Station, TX) 27 (62%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (38%) [2023] Cedar Park (TX) 24 (57%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (43%) [2023] Smithson Valley (Spring Branch, TX) 31 (77%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 19 (23%)[2023] Wagner (San Antonio, TX) 26 (60%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (40%) Wake up ccwarcat and start learning more about HSFB outside of this region!Wow… EXCELLENT WORK Clem!! That was even eye opening to me!!! He’ll still be in here with his woulda-coulda-shoulda crap afterwards!!! CP isn’t at the talent & coaching level of 2020 and yet it shows they get it done against PSJA North! A team ccwarcat feels is a rare one and that will do this year what hasn’t been done in a very very very VERY long time!! Meaning a 4A/5A RGV team going to a State Championship
|
|
|
Post by picodegallo on Nov 2, 2023 9:04:41 GMT -6
I started thinking about ccwarcat 's statement and how he believes Aledo is the only team that can beat PSJA North. So, I'm going to spend a few minutes on calpreps and see what their computer thinks. Yes, I know this is a computer but the fact is that it is about 75% or a little better accuracy at this stage of the season and even much higher than that when it shows point spreads of more than 10 points in a projected matchup. There are 6 teams in red below where it shows North with 15% or LESS chance of winning the game. Of those 6 teams NONE are showing less than a 2 TD win by them. There are 8 more in orange where North is at least a 10 point underdog with 25% or less chance of winning the game. Region 1 Teams[2023] Abilene (TX) 34 (84%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 19 (16%) [2023] Lubbock-Cooper (Lubbock, TX) 35 (81%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (19%)[2023] Amarillo (TX) 24 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 23 (47%) [2023] Aledo (TX) 41 (94%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 17 (6%)[2023] Ryan [Billy] (Denton, TX) 22 (57%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 20 (43%)[2023] Northwest (Justin, TX) 31 (74%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (26%)[2023] Midlothian (TX) 31 (74%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (26%)[2023] Red Oak (TX) 28 (65%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (35%) [2023] Lake Belton (Temple, TX) 34 (58%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 31 (42%) Region 2 Teams[2023] Richland (North Richland Hills, TX) 28 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 27 (47%) [2023] Lone Star (Frisco, TX) 31 (74%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (26%)[2023] Reedy [Rick] (Frisco, TX) 35 (86%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 19 (14%)[2023] Wakeland [Justin] (Frisco, TX) 28 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 27 (47%) [2023] Longview (TX) 40 (98%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 8 (2%)[2023] Forney (TX) 38 (95%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 13 (5%)[2023] McKinney North (McKinney, TX) 34 (77%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (23%) [2023] Barbers Hill (Mt. Belvieu, TX) 35 (75%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 24 (25%)[2023] Memorial (Port Arthur, TX) 31 (53%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 30 (47%) Region 3 Teams[2023] Fulshear (TX) 41 (88%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (12%)[2023] Magnolia (TX) 28 (62%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (38%) [2023] College Station (TX) 48 (88%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 28 (12%)[2023] A&M Consolidated (College Station, TX) 27 (62%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 21 (38%) [2023] Cedar Park (TX) 24 (57%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (43%) [2023] Smithson Valley (Spring Branch, TX) 31 (77%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 19 (23%)[2023] Wagner (San Antonio, TX) 26 (60%), [2023] Pharr-San Juan-Alamo North (Pharr, TX) 22 (40%) Wake up ccwarcat and start learning more about HSFB outside of this region!Wow… EXCELLENT WORK Clem!! That was even eye opening to me!!! He’ll still be in here with his woulda-coulda-shoulda crap afterwards!!! CP isn’t at the talent & coaching level of 2020 and yet it shows they get it done against PSJA North! A team ccwarcat feels is a rare one and that will do this year what hasn’t been done in a very very very VERY long time!! Meaning a 4A/5A RGV team going to a State Championship Like the dog ate the playbook? I'd hate to be that dog's owner because that poor pooch probably has issues pooping with all the paper in his bowels. Seriously he will blame in the "hide the ball" offense because that's all he comes back with. If the other team would just play the offense my team wants them to play, we'd win 110% of the time.. And the world would be full of cotton candy, unicorns and wouldn't that be grand!
|
|
|
Post by ccwarcat on Nov 2, 2023 14:15:20 GMT -6
Oh, I didn’t know we are now taking Calpreps as truth. Back when I used to use Calpreps to prove a point y’all called me delusional.
So you’re delusional.
See how that works? Fun, right?
|
|
|
Post by Hounhound on Nov 2, 2023 14:21:23 GMT -6
I’ll give College Station a half to get everything worked out. that is before they drop the hammer in the 2nd half… Sound familiar?
1st Half CS 21 PSJA 13
FINAL CS 52 PSJA 23 I think your first half score is almost dead on the $. I think it would end up a little lower spread though just simply because of North's big front line and maybe running clock with some 1st downs. I think CS would win it about 42-21 or maybe a TD more. Your final score may very well be right on the money though if North struggles with CS' speed. Who has PSJA North played that has the kind of speed College Station Does? No ccwarcat. Miller isn't even close.
|
|
|
Post by Hounhound on Nov 2, 2023 14:27:29 GMT -6
Oh, I didn’t know we are now taking Calpreps as truth. Back when I used to use Calpreps to prove a point y’all called me delusional. So you’re delusional. See how that works? Fun, right? Up top it said Cal Preps was 75% accurate. That's way higher than your pick'em average. And You have to use the current year teams. not go back and pick Vets best and hop we wouldn't notice.
|
|
|
Post by Clemensbuff on Nov 2, 2023 15:03:22 GMT -6
Oh, I didn’t know we are now taking Calpreps as truth. Back when I used to use Calpreps to prove a point y’all called me delusional. So you’re delusional. See how that works? Fun, right? I clearly stated the accuracy of it which is actually VERY GOOD when a team is picked to win by double digit points which in this case you can see that includes a LOT of teams in the state. Again, the only one that is delusional is you and that is because you know very, very little about any teams outside of your area. You are the one who stated the only team who can beat North is Aledo. That statement alone shows your lack of statewide knowledge. Last, delusional is making silly excuses every single time your team loses a game!
|
|
|
Post by ccwarcat on Nov 2, 2023 16:09:48 GMT -6
Oh, I didn’t know we are now taking Calpreps as truth. Back when I used to use Calpreps to prove a point y’all called me delusional. So you’re delusional. See how that works? Fun, right? I clearly stated the accuracy of it which is actually VERY GOOD when a team is picked to win by double digit points which in this case you can see that includes a LOT of teams in the state. Again, the only one that is delusional is you and that is because you know very, very little about any teams outside of your area. You are the one who stated the only team who can beat North is Aledo. That statement alone shows your lack of statewide knowledge. Last, delusional is making silly excuses every single time your team loses a game! Only 1 team will get an opportunity to play the R4 representative in Round 5. I hope it's a team on your list.
|
|