|
Post by flowtowntigers on Sept 3, 2020 9:42:53 GMT -6
High School teams are limited to the talent in their town or area. Even the worst D3 teams are recruiting state wide, even nationality for talent. They also find upper leve classmen transfers from higher level college football teams.
So to answer your question the best HS team could not beat the worst D3 team. The same logic goes for why Alabama could not beat the browns or dolphins.
|
|
|
Post by picodegallo on Sept 4, 2020 8:54:47 GMT -6
High School teams are limited to the talent in their town or area. Even the worst D3 teams are recruiting state wide, even nationality for talent. They also find upper leve classmen transfers from higher level college football teams. So to answer your question the best HS team could not beat the worst D3 team. The same logic goes for why Alabama could not beat the browns or dolphins. I disagree about the worst D3 teams only in the sense a number of them are not scholarship supported, hence they do not have the ability to recruit even mediocre talent as well as attract staff to coach them into a mean lean fighting machine. If you put a very young low tier D3 team up against a very well stocked Class 5A or 6A team with multiple players headed to D1 Programs after their Senior season, it's an even match. I saw Sul Ross and Texas Wesleyan play a very horrible TAMUK team the past couple of season. Trust me I saw much bigger and faster kids on the high school level than were on those two teams. TAMUK beat both by 60 or more.
|
|
|
Post by Clemensbuff on Sept 4, 2020 12:22:01 GMT -6
High School teams are limited to the talent in their town or area. Even the worst D3 teams are recruiting state wide, even nationality for talent. They also find upper leve classmen transfers from higher level college football teams. So to answer your question the best HS team could not beat the worst D3 team. The same logic goes for why Alabama could not beat the browns or dolphins. I disagree about the worst D3 teams only in the sense a number of them are not scholarship supported, hence they do not have the ability to recruit even mediocre talent as well as attract staff to coach them into a mean lean fighting machine. If you put a very young low tier D3 team up against a very well stocked Class 5A or 6A team with multiple players headed to D1 Programs after their Senior season, it's an even match. I saw Sul Ross and Texas Wesleyan play a very horrible TAMUK team the past couple of season. Trust me I saw much bigger and faster kids on the high school level than were on those two teams. TAMUK beat both by 60 or more. Absolutely I agree Teams like North Shore and Duncanville are LOADED with FBS Power 5 talent and some of these lower end D3 teams don't have a single kid as a senior that could make an FBS roster....literally. I'm not trying to badmouth these D3 schools but it is the truth and it is why they are D3.
|
|
rgvfb
Sub-Varsity
Posts: 607
|
Post by rgvfb on Sept 12, 2020 14:42:36 GMT -6
They could probably beat a good amount of d3 and naia teams but any decent d3 and up team will not lose to them. I feel like d2 teams will forsure beat them.
|
|