Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2013 18:26:57 GMT -6
The question on everyone's mind, could Alice beat Carroll? Joke!! Yeah! The Alice peeps bragged last season when they spanked Carroll in last year's scrimmage...so, since their team is SO GREAT this year, they should be able to demolish Carroll. I bet they lay 60 on them...Lol!
|
|
Purp
Varsity
Posts: 3,969
|
Post by Purp on Aug 12, 2013 18:30:01 GMT -6
The question on everyone's mind, could Alice beat Carroll? Joke!! Yeah! The Alice peeps bragged last season when they spanked Carroll in last year's scrimmage...so, since their team is SO GREAT this year, they should be able to demolish Carroll. I bet they lay 60 on them...Lol! Those poor Carroll folks. What did they do to have to scrimmage Alice.
|
|
|
Post by sotex on Aug 12, 2013 18:35:05 GMT -6
The question on everyone's mind, could Alice beat Carroll? Joke!! Yeah! The Alice peeps bragged last season when they spanked Carroll in last year's scrimmage...so, since their team is SO GREAT this year, they should be able to demolish Carroll. I bet they lay 60 on them...Lol! You certainly didn't hear that from me. Scrimmages are meaningless. I did like what I saw from the kids in that scrimmage.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2013 18:35:40 GMT -6
Yeah, it seems that all CCISD cares about is the baseball programs... Yep. And to a point basketball. Have to hire good program builders and not coaches with losing programs for one. Then allow them to build the foundation within their middle schools. Not going to happen until the CCISD superintendent gets a clue and cleans house or a school board gets some testicular fortitude to demand change and hold both the Super and AD accountable. For some reason I think that AD will be there for a few more years. I have my theories. They might get a wake up call IF the CCISD's all drop in 2016 4a and get put in a district with Calallen, GP, Flour Bluff and Alice and then NONE of their football teams make the playoffs. Seems like they've been content making the playoffs in the weak 5a districts they've been in our the weak 4A districts. Won't happen if the above comes together in 2016 unless one of the four noted has a very off year.
|
|
|
Post by fancrab77 on Aug 12, 2013 19:50:44 GMT -6
Is it just me... or did Red Rage change his name to cochino? smh
|
|
Purp
Varsity
Posts: 3,969
|
Post by Purp on Aug 12, 2013 19:54:05 GMT -6
Is it just me... or did Red Rage change his name to cochino? smh Don't mention that name ever again!!!! LOL
|
|
|
Post by sandcrab79 on Aug 12, 2013 20:29:30 GMT -6
Is it just me... or did Red Rage change his name to cochino? smh No, actually Redrage was pretty sharp and backed up his statements with facts...
|
|
|
Post by cochino on Aug 12, 2013 20:46:35 GMT -6
Is it just me... or did Red Rage change his name to cochino? smh No, actually Redrage was pretty sharp and backed up his statements with facts... I back up everything I say. It's you PLC kids that have no idea how to debate. It's all "na na na na boo boo" stuff from you guys.
|
|
|
Post by Clemensbuff on Aug 12, 2013 21:10:09 GMT -6
And you are wrong.......plain and simple! PAM beat LaPorte in 2011 and we steam rolled them the next week.......51-17 when we pulled starters with 3 min left in 3rd. Guyer would have spanked em........plain & simple. PAM may or may not have had more D1 athletes than guyer, BUT THEY WERE NOT THE BETTER TEAM. Before you make anymore statements like this you may wanna do a little research on Guyer and how many kids they put into D1 football in 2010 & 2011 (2011 & 2012 graduating classes). You may want to believe PAM is better because they throttled your team handily.....but I got to see both teams and it aint close! The "this team beat that team that we beat" argument. Lol. PLC beat Calallen 2 years ago. Then PLC lost to Tivy. Then Calallen clobbered Tivy 48-15. So your "we beat this team that beat that team" argument isn't an exact science. Nice try. Sorry Cochino, but I saw both teams and they were NOT EVEN a little bit close. Turn this in to what you want but the bottom line is that you want PAM to have been a great team because of how they ran through your boys....THEY WERE NOT. They did NOTHING in the 2010 playoffs and Guyer went to the title game and then we whooped em badly in 2011 when they made the semis. Sorry, but you are reaching at best here. Just because a team has some D1, FBS type kids does not make them good in anyway whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by cochino on Aug 12, 2013 21:28:21 GMT -6
The "this team beat that team that we beat" argument. Lol. PLC beat Calallen 2 years ago. Then PLC lost to Tivy. Then Calallen clobbered Tivy 48-15. So your "we beat this team that beat that team" argument isn't an exact science. Nice try. Sorry Cochino, but I saw both teams and they were NOT EVEN a little bit close. Turn this in to what you want but the bottom line is that you want PAM to have been a great team because of how they ran through your boys....THEY WERE NOT. They did NOTHING in the 2010 playoffs and Guyer went to the title game and then we whooped em badly in 2011 when they made the semis. Sorry, but you are reaching at best here. Just because a team has some D1, FBS type kids does not make them good in anyway whatsoever. I think my PLC/Calallen/Tivy example proves I am not reaching. Can't say it any more simply.
|
|
|
Post by Clemensbuff on Aug 12, 2013 21:44:55 GMT -6
Sorry Cochino, but I saw both teams and they were NOT EVEN a little bit close. Turn this in to what you want but the bottom line is that you want PAM to have been a great team because of how they ran through your boys....THEY WERE NOT. They did NOTHING in the 2010 playoffs and Guyer went to the title game and then we whooped em badly in 2011 when they made the semis. Sorry, but you are reaching at best here. Just because a team has some D1, FBS type kids does not make them good in anyway whatsoever. I think my PLC/Calallen/Tivy example proves I am not reaching. Can't say it any more simply. OK, so you are saying that PAM was a state powerhouse early in the year when they whooped your boys but then were terrible late in the year.....is that about right? ROFLMAO You have got to be kidding me. YOu claim to have all this football knowlede and then come up with statements like this......and then a few days later you throw out there just the opposite thing in that you realize a few great athletes don't make a good team. WHICH IS IT? Also, when did you see Guyer play last? As stated, I've seen both in the same two years PAM ran all over your Yotes and I'll say it again....THEY WERE NOT A GREAT TEAM, they were a good team. You act as though that squad was nationally ranked and TX 5a State Champs. THEY WERE NEITHER. They squeaked by North Shore 14-7 who was 8-4, squeaked by Channelview 47-44, and Clear Sprins 38-35, and then got smoke by us in the semis. You have absolutely no basis or facts to claim that they were better than Guyer, much less would have whipped them like you said. You sit here and brag on threads that you back your statements with facts......SHOW US SOME TO BACK YOUR STATEMENTS you made here.
|
|
|
Post by sandcrabs04 on Aug 12, 2013 21:52:01 GMT -6
No, actually Redrage was pretty sharp and backed up his statements with facts... I back up everything I say. It's you PLC kids that have no idea how to debate. It's all "na na na na boo boo" stuff from you guys.Β You use your opinions as facts. Which they are not. Case in point I said el campo plays in a tougher region with better comp And puts out better athletes year in and year out. And you said they just aren't on calallens level. But you provide no facts or even remote facts ro back up your statement. Instead you try and twist the arguement into something else by making assumptions then hopeing someone bites on it. The force is not with you young padwan
|
|
|
Post by FB fan on Aug 12, 2013 21:55:09 GMT -6
I back up everything I say. It's you PLC kids that have no idea how to debate. It's all "na na na na boo boo" stuff from you guys.Β You use your opinions as facts. Which they are not. Case in point I said el campo plays in a tougher region with better comp And puts out better athletes year in and year out. And you said they just aren't on calallens level. But you provide no facts or even remote facts ro back up your statement. Instead you try and twist the arguement into something else by making assumptions then hopeing someone bites on it. The force is not with you young padwan What are your facts that "el Campo plays in a tougher region with better comp and puts out better athletes year in and year out?" How is that not just your opinion stated as fact?
|
|
Purp
Varsity
Posts: 3,969
|
Post by Purp on Aug 12, 2013 21:55:16 GMT -6
I back up everything I say. It's you PLC kids that have no idea how to debate. It's all "na na na na boo boo" stuff from you guys.Β You use your opinions as facts. Which they are not. Case in point I said el campo plays in a tougher region with better comp And puts out better athletes year in and year out. And you said they just aren't on calallens level. But you provide no facts or even remote facts ro back up your statement. Instead you try and twist the arguement into something else by making assumptions then hopeing someone bites on it. The force is not with you young padwan All you have to do is look at Clemensbuff posts above and see cochina is full of BS
|
|
|
Post by sandcrabs04 on Aug 12, 2013 22:16:35 GMT -6
You use your opinions as facts. Which they are not. Case in point I said el campo plays in a tougher region with better comp And puts out better athletes year in and year out. And you said they just aren't on calallens level. But you provide no facts or even remote facts ro back up your statement. Instead you try and twist the arguement into something else by making assumptions then hopeing someone bites on it. The force is not with you young padwan What are your facts that "el Campo plays in a tougher region with better comp and puts out better athletes year in and year out?" How is that not just your opinion stated as fact? So you think region 4 has stiffer comp then region 3?? Are you high?? Lets talk about tje Texas citys. La marques when they were in 4a. Bay city was a powerhouse for along time. Angleton rosenburg lamar ect all have kids routinely play major college ball. Angleton. El campo bay city. La marque all have guys that played in the nfl. A few of them still play currently. The overall comp is better in region 3. Better athletes and a differnt level of play. ThaTs not say the Calallens of the world wouldn't compete. They would. But the 10 win seasons every year would not have happened near as often. If at all. If your gonna point to el campos records. They've almost always had winning seasons dating back to before any or us were born. They have a solid program that routinely beat schools with enrollements much bigger and more talented overall. Calallen until recently hasnt had another team challenge thm year in and year out. The competion level overall is not on par with region 3.
|
|